HAYDEN WHITE METAHISTORY THE HISTORICAL IMAGINATION IN NINETEENTH-CENTURY EUROPE PDF
In White’s view, beyond the surface level of the historical text, there is a deep structural, or latent, content that is generally poetic and Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe. Front Cover · Hayden White . Since its initial publication in , Hayden White’s Metahistory has remained an essential book for understanding the nature of historical. Title, Metahistory: the historical imagination in nineteenth-century Europe / Hayden White. Author, White, Hayden V., Extent, dpi TIFF G4 page images.
|Published (Last):||14 September 2008|
|PDF File Size:||15.63 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||10.40 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The historical profession was not formed in a vacuum; and historical practice was not a matter of a priori rules.
Metahistory: the historical imagination in nineteenth-century Europe
This latent poetic and linguistic content—which White eurooe the “metahistorical element”—essentially serves as a paradigm for what an “appropriate” historical explanation should be.
My library Help Advanced Book Search.
For instance, Arthur Marwick praised it as “a brilliant analysis of the rhetorical techniques of some famous early 19th-century historians The book is not an ideal was to be introduced to these figures – i had enough trouble trying to remember what the difference between synecdoche and metaphor was – but wnite does serve, to some degree, and after the introduction where his theory is laid out durope, i think that’s most un what i got from the book.
In this classic work, White argues that a deep structural content lies beyond the surface level of historical texts. The chapter on Hegel is like a mental firewall, real difficult to get thr This was a difficult book for me to get through – never read literary theory, and have not read much historiography, and they both give me headaches.
Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe
This metahistoory to charges that White was not a relativist, but rather, a linguistic imgination. His books and essays analyze the narratives of nineteenth-and twentieth-century historians and philosophers, suggesting that historical discourse is a form of fiction that can be classified and studied on the basis of its structure and its use of language.
I expected a structuralist, linguistic examination of parts of texts but in the end his analysis is about the different ways of realism in 19th century historiography and philosophy of history.
He makes interesting statements and I think he made a great starting points of presenting his ideas on historiography and its fictive elements. Sometimes the details were a bit baffling. Or maybe it is a more general question we all must answer and, for those of us who are historically minded, the study of the expanse of time brings the question front and center. Selected pages Title Page. This claim is on more solid metaahistory, as White has always tended to favour dealing with the finished product of historians’ labours over looking at actual historical practice.
Related articles in Google Scholar. The Content of the Form: Adeline Koh rated it it was amazing Jul 15, I expected a structuralist, linguistic examination of parts of texts but in the end his analysis is about the different ways of real I must admit that I found this book really confusing and it took me quite a while to get through it.
The author’s thesis is simple enough – the same historical hiztorical can be described in good conscience in different ways, just like any story.
White ultimately attacks the notion that modern history texts present objective, accurate explanations of the past; instead, he argues that historians and philosophers operate under unarticulated assumptions in arranging, selecting, and interpreting events.
Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. Paul argues that during the s and early s, White had three key influences: As I wholeheartedly believe this correlation between the 19th century and the early 21st century, and as I too have studied history hoping to learn some “truths” of humanity, I was thrilled when White repeatedly found ninetewnth-century of his eight authors grappling with a central conundrum, with which I struggle daily – action versus withdrawal.
Apr 21, Miss rated it liked it. In White’s view, beyond the surface level of the historical text, there is a deep structural, or latent, content that is generally poetic and specifically hahden in nature. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe – Hayden White – Google Books
White argued that the Holocaust belonged to a special class of events, modernist events p. Paul wrote on White for his PhD dissertation, and has consulted White at length in the context of the former project and the current book.
Back to 8 Ibid, p. Items that negate on the figurative level what they say on the literal level. White contends that history in the newly scientific, Enlightenment world of the 18th century suffered from extreme irony.
Hayden White is a controversial figure in ahite world of history. This deeper content – the metahistorical element – indicates what an “appropriate” historical explanation should be.
A condition of apparent peace, through conflict, to a peaceful social order.